National identity and economic inequality: New insights from disadvantaged and advantaged groups


Journal article


Valeria De Cristofaro, Carmen Cervone, Silvia Filippi, Marco Marinucci, Andrea Scatolon, Roberta Rosa Valtorta, Michela Vezzoli, Valerio Pellegrini
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 35, 2025, pp. e70068


View PDF Data
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Cristofaro, V. D., Cervone, C., Filippi, S., Marinucci, M., Scatolon, A., Valtorta, R. R., … Pellegrini, V. (2025). National identity and economic inequality: New insights from disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Journal of Community &Amp; Applied Social Psychology, 35, e70068. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70068


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Cristofaro, Valeria De, Carmen Cervone, Silvia Filippi, Marco Marinucci, Andrea Scatolon, Roberta Rosa Valtorta, Michela Vezzoli, and Valerio Pellegrini. “National Identity and Economic Inequality: New Insights from Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 35 (2025): e70068.


MLA   Click to copy
Cristofaro, Valeria De, et al. “National Identity and Economic Inequality: New Insights from Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups.” Journal of Community &Amp; Applied Social Psychology, vol. 35, 2025, p. e70068, doi:10.1002/casp.70068.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{valeria2025a,
  title = {National identity and economic inequality: New insights from disadvantaged and advantaged groups},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology},
  pages = {e70068},
  volume = {35},
  doi = {10.1002/casp.70068},
  author = {Cristofaro, Valeria De and Cervone, Carmen and Filippi, Silvia and Marinucci, Marco and Scatolon, Andrea and Valtorta, Roberta Rosa and Vezzoli, Michela and Pellegrini, Valerio}
}

Abstract

This research examined the association of national identity with system justification and collective action against economic inequality specifically relating to socioeconomic status (Study 1), ethnicity (Study 2) and gender (Study 3) among both disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Additionally, in Study 3, we investigated the competing predictive role of national narcissism. Across all studies (N = 3387) and regardless of group membership, we consistently found that participants who scored higher on national identity showed stronger system justification and, in turn, lower joint collective action intentions. After controlling for national narcissism in Study 3, however, the relation of national identity with joint collective action through system justification became non-significant. Instead, national narcissism was positively related to system justification and then negatively associated with joint collective action after controlling for national identity. These results advance the understanding of the psychosocial pathways that undermine collective efforts toward social change, thereby contributing to the maintenance of economic inequality.